Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Home News CEAP study examines nitrogen, copper levels in bay watershed

CEAP study examines nitrogen, copper levels in bay watershed

Industry News

Results are troublesome in areas.


CAMBRIDGE and DENTON, Md. - A comprehensive study of pollutants in a major Chesapeake Bay tributary revealed troublesome levels of nitrogen and copper that could flow into the bay, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) scientists and their cooperators.

Scientists with USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and their collaborators conducted the study as part of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) for Maryland’s Choptank River Watershed, which flows into the Chesapeake Bay. CEAP began in 2004 and focuses on the effects of conservation practices and farm bill conservation programs on 37 watersheds nationwide.

Greg McCarty, a soil scientist with the ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory at Beltsville, Md., and Laura McConnell, a chemist at the ARS Environmental Management and Byproducts Utilization Laboratory in Beltsville, lead the team’s CEAP Choptank project. ARS is USDA’s principal intramural scientific research agency.

Monitoring the Choptank provides information needed to develop new conservation practices, refine existing ones and design programs to evaluate efforts to clean the endangered bay.

Sampling the water every two months for three years, the scientists found that nitrate concentrations often exceeded levels that can cause algal blooms. Nitrate concentrations were highest at the headwaters where farming is concentrated, suggesting that agricultural fertilizers, including manure and poultry litter, are primary sources.

But phosphorus concentrations were similar throughout the river, suggesting multiple sources. While some evidence points to wastewater treatment plants as a likely primary source, agriculture is also a major contributor.

High copper concentrations were found in almost all samples at the lower reaches of the Choptank, but not in the upstream areas. This suggests that agriculture is not the primary source. The levels were high enough to be toxic to clams and other aquatic invertebrates that help feed and filter the Bay.

Herbicides and their byproducts were present year-round. Concentrations did not approach established levels of concern for aquatic organisms. Still, this research shows the importance of agricultural practices that reduce herbicide losses, particularly from springtime applications.

The results of this study were published in the journal Science of the Total Environment.

Read more about this research in the August 2010 issue of Agricultural Research magazine, available online at

www.ars.usda.gov/is/AR/archive/aug10/chesapeake0810.htm

.

See the ARS Electronic Information Kit on the Chesapeake Bay.

www.ars.usda.gov/is/br/bay/index.htm



 

Top news

The Death Book

Sure, it’s morbid. But it’s essential. Create an instruction manual for your company in the event of your untimely demise.

An anti-complacency culture

Employees at Capstone Landscape Management are pumped – and the company is primed for growth. Why? There’s no opportunity to get stale.

Cat's Built For It trials

Five of Cat's machines go head-to-head with a stack of blocks in this video.

Morbark increases safety emphasis

The ChipSafe shield and training requirements are designed to increase brush chipper safety.

PGMS accepting Green Star applications

Professional Grounds Management unveils new system for submissions.