Friday, October 24, 2014

Home Magazine The 3 Rs of staffing

The 3 Rs of staffing

Columns - Industry Voices

In contrast, an advanced perspective views staffing as a three-step process: retention, recruitment and review

Steve Cesare | July 19, 2012

Steve Cesare

Most landscapers believe staffing is a solitary function aimed at filling vacant positions. That isolated interpretation fails to consider the causes of the vacancy and the consequences of the staffing decision. In contrast, an advanced perspective views staffing as a three-step process: retention, recruitment and review. This aligned sequence enables landscapers to address root causes of employee turnover, generate an ample talent pool of qualified candidates and ensure performance expectations are met by the new employee.


Retention. Effective staffing is premised on employee retention; employee retention is based on minimizing employee turnover. Employees leave organizations for reasons that are either external (e.g., family relocation, economic conditions, personal issues) or internal (e.g., lack of advancement, poor fit with company culture, supervisor conflict) to the company.

Ironically, most companies are their own worst enemies in that they don’t proactively eliminate their internal causes of turnover. In short, retention prevents turnover.

Companies can collect turnover-related information from current and former employees in multiple forms: interviews with new employees after being on the job for 30 days, annual employee surveys, exit interviews and a 30-day follow-up telephone interview with former employees.

By collecting information from all of these sources, a company can garner significant insight into the actual causes of turnover (e.g., insufficient training, poor morale, supervisory incompatibility, dysfunctional culture, job stress, unchallenging work, inadequate pay/benefits).

Once identified, the company can then design a retention program targeting its most problematic drivers of employee turnover.

In brief, a “best practices” retention program maximizes employee engagement by routinely clarifying how the employee’s job performance contributes to organizational success, ensures its supervisors are well trained (e.g., goal setting, delegation, coaching) and leverages a company culture that fosters employees being valued, meritocracy, and morale.


Recruitment. Unfortunately, many companies have a reactive view of staffing. They only recruit candidates when vacancies exist. That approach is desperate, ineffective and irresponsible.

As my colleague Bill Arman explains in his book “The Harvest Way for Recruiting and Hiring the Right People,” recruitment must be done continuously. Rather than only interviewing for current vacancies, clairvoyant landscapers routinely interview candidates even when vacancies don’t exist (e.g., employee upgrades, bench strength, “tag and release”). To support that staffing equation, recruitment interviews should be conducted every week.
 


The goal of an effective recruitment plan is to establish a large pool of qualified candidates.

This goal is likely to occur by implementing an integrated set of recruitment initiatives: a rewarding employee referral program, community partnerships (e.g., vendors, agencies, local businesses) and appropriate advertisements (e.g., newspapers, website, flyers).

Landscapers relying on this proactive recruitment approach, incorporating all of the aforementioned recruitment activities, will likely fill their vacancies with higher-caliber candidates in shorter timeframes, at less cost, than other companies that simply respond to vacancies as they occur.


Review. Staffing does not end when the new employee is hired. Many landscapers believe the goal of the staffing sequence is to fill every vacancy. That is an incomplete criterion.

The actual goal of the staffing sequence is to fill every vacancy with an effective employee capable of improving organizational results. To validate that outcome, all new hires should receive a formal performance review after 30 and 90 days on the job.

The 30-day review typically addresses fundamental performance standards like punctuality, appearance, cultural fit, training aptitude, team player, initiative, policy compliance and safety focus.

The 90-day review evaluates employees on applied performance indices like efficiency, functional skills, equipment operation, planning, communication skills, work quality and value proposition.

In keeping with the formal nature of this behaviorally-documented performance management process, the new hire should be informed of the results of the 30-day review, receive complimentary or constructive coaching as necessary and be informed of the specific expectations for the next performance review scheduled to occur in 60 days.

If the employee fails to demonstrate immediate, significant, and sustained progress toward being an effective performer, a timely decision to terminate should be made as appropriate.


Steve Cesare is an industrial psychologist with the Harvest Group, a landscape consulting group. Send your HR questions to cesare@gie.net.

x