The decision seems simple enough to add irrigation services to your company’s mix. Your competitors are doing it, and often times you’re paying a subcontractor to do it for you. Why not do it yourself? That would let you keep profits in your company and perhaps earn some additional work.
Unfortunately, it’s not quite that easy. Contractors who have decided to offer irrigation services or bring subcontracted irrigation services in-house are generally glad they’ve done so, but they warn it’s not always an easy transition for the business.
SINK THE SUBS. Eliminating the use of subcontractors is clearly one of the most popular reasons for contractors offering irrigation services.
“We subcontracted all of our irrigation work until 1994,” explained Audrie Seeley, owner, Audrie Seeley & Co., Kansas City, Mo. “We brought the work in-house because we just couldn’t control the subcontractors’ schedules.”
Anderson Lawn Care Inc., Leesburg, Ind., learned the hard way about the potential trouble associated with subcontractors handling irrigation work. “One entire season was changed overnight because the subcontractor decided to ignore our contract in favor of a larger contract he was offered the night before,” according to Bobbi Anderson, co-owner. “We had 15 systems that were never turned on that should have been.”
There are additional benefits other than eliminating subcontractors, however. “We view offering irrigation like buying insurance for our new lawn installations,” mentioned Lori Spielman, owner, Lori Spielman Landscaping, Ellington, Conn. “We decided to add irrigation instead of mowing because it seemed to go better with our sod installation and seeding work. Otherwise, we were leaving subcontractors to care for the turf we installed, but we were still ultimately responsible for the health of the lawn.”
“We decided that we have a better understanding of how to care for plant material and lawns in terms of proper irrigation,” noted Chris Williams, operations manager, White Oak Landscape Company Inc., Kennesaw, Ga. “Plus, we felt that what-ever money we were subbing out would become revenues for us.”
| The Supply Line |
“It wasn’t until we went to our supplier that we saw the demand for irrigation work,” admitted Bobbi Anderson, co-owner, Anderson Lawn Care Inc., Leesburg, Ind. “The most important reason we chose our supplier was the service we received there. They put together equipment kits for our trucks and made sure we had what we needed.” Michael Llop, president, Sandy Springs Lawn Scapes Inc., Atlanta, Ga., relies on his supplier as well. “When we brought irrigation in-house we built a good relationship with our supplier who does some design work and materials take-offs for us,” he said. Some irrigation suppliers offer training seminars for contractors interested in learning more about irrigation technology and services. “Manufacturers are getting more involved in training the contractors as the equipment gets more technical,” said Elaine Krizenesky, marketing coordinator, Rain Bird Sales Inc., Azusa, Calif. “For example, a lot of controllers available today are complicated to learn. So we’re not doing our job as manufacturers if we don’t make sure the contractors are able to use the equipment.” |
JUMP RIGHT IN. For the most part, contractors adding irrigation capabilities weren’t hesitant to offer the full range of services.
“We started right out offering both installation and maintenance services,” explained Jeremy Hope, irrigation manager, Audrie Seeley & Co. “We started out the first couple of years doing only residential work because the commercial projects generally involve much more complicated systems and contractors need to coordinate the work with the other trades involved on the project. We wanted to be comfortable with our abilities before taking on those projects.”
“Along with installations, we perform basic spring start-ups and winterization of systems with one crew,” said Michael Llop, president, Sandy Springs Lawn Scapes Inc., Atlanta, Ga. “If we’re really backed up, we contract with an area company to do the maintenance work, and we charge a small handling fee in addition to the subcontractor’s fee to cover our administration costs.
“Last year, we had an eight- to 12-week backlog on irrigation installations, so we subcontracted the maintenance work,” he added.
“We did only maintenance work our first year,” noted Spielman. “We felt the feedback we could obtain by working on the systems and seeing how they affect the turf was too important to ignore as preparation for installation work.”
Spielman recommended any contractors installing irrigation systems also maintain those systems. “Otherwise, you don’t learn anything about the work you’re doing after you walk away from the installation,” she explained.
MONEY MAKER? The ultimate factor for adding or deleting a service among a company’s offerings obviously comes down to that service’s impact on the bottom line. Although some contractors have found profitable markets, most note that they see tight margins and work that can turn costly if it’s not done properly.
“This can be very profitable work if you’re efficient at it,” recognized Llop. “But one of the downsides is that if you’re not efficient or you don’t have the right people, you can end up losing money.
“We lost money on a few initial jobs,” Llop continued. “But we learned to build extra time into the labor costs for our learning curve. It probably cost us a few jobs, but we didn’t lose money on the jobs, and now that we’re more efficient we’ve stopped adding in that extra time.”
Llop explained that his company pays specific attention to comparing its job estimates to the final actual job costs to make sure they are bidding and doing the work properly. “We job cost everything on a site per zone and per head,” he said. “We can’t afford to be losing money and find out after the fact. This method lets us pull detailed reports and understand where we’re making mistakes and losing the money.”
Spielman has been disappointed with lack of additional profits she anticipated irrigation service to bring. “We expected to generate more revenue, but it’s taken us longer to develop a good list of irrigation clients than we expected,” she admitted.
Some contractors may actually be able to make more money from irrigation than they do because they undercharge the customer.
“Contractors using subcontractors obviously mark up the subcontractor’s price to cover their administrative costs, and they usually give up that administration fee when they bring the work in-house,” Williams lamented. “Contractors should keep that fee in place. I see too much irrigation work sold too cheaply for the amount of labor involved. If you’re already getting that markup, continue to do so — but then try to offer additional services or improved quality to the customer.”
| Why Buy? |
Contractors who have gone through this process are split when it comes to buying vs. renting. The key factor in the decision seems to be the company’s immediate plans for what type of irrigation jobs it will handle. “We were only doing about $40,000 a year in irrigation work initially, so we only bought a trencher with a boring unit and a trencher attachment for our skid-steer,” said Michael Llop, president, Sandy Springs Lawn Scapes Inc., Atlanta, Ga. “But you have to be efficient with rental equipment, because if you don’t get a task done on time it will cost an extra day’s rental.” "We bought a truck, a pipe pulling machine, a trencher and an air compressor, which probably cost us more than $50,000,” noted Lori Spielman, owner, Lori Spielman Landscaping, Ellington, Conn. “We could have rented equipment, but what if we had a job to do and the equipment wasn’t available?” Chris Williams, operations manager, White Oak Landscape Company Inc., Kennesaw, Ga., is a proponent of renting. “We bought a couple of vehicles because that made the most sense,” he said. “We rented the trenching and digging equipment for the first few years because there isn’t one piece of equipment to fit all of our irrigation needs, and we weren’t big enough to buy all of the equipment we might have needed. With rental equipment, it’s easier to change between types of machines and not have to worry about the cost of a piece of equipment that’s just sitting at the office.” “If you can buy the equipment, it makes your financial statements look a lot better, but you have to be able to justify the purchases with the revenue you’re earning,” Llop noted. “We waited until we had a couple of big jobs lined up before we decided we could justify that type of capital expenditure.” |
PEOPLE PROBLEMS. As with the entire industry, a lack of labor is often the limiting factor for a company’s ability to profit from irrigation services. Companies’ approaches have varied from hiring individuals with irrigation experience to training current employees for the work.
“Initially, we hired people with irrigation experience,” explained Hope. “It made a lot more sense since none of us were trained to train anyone in irrigation.”
The limited volume of irrigation work at Sand Springs led Llop to settle on training current staff. “The problem is that this type of cross-training means everybody is working at different speeds and levels based on how quickly they learn and how much time they have for being trained,” he said. “It also creates challenges keeping the better people working on the irrigation jobs when there’s other work to do.”
“We train from within because it’s so difficult to find the labor,” said Williams. “Plus, we’ve found that hiring irrigation crews from outside can cause problems. Each person has his or her own preferred techniques, and they don’t always mesh with the company’s techniques.”
"Acquiring the training is difficult,” agreed Spielman. “In our area, irrigation technicians have to be licensed, and that’s a difficult process. We send people out for irrigation training once or twice a year, but a lot of the training is acquired doing the job because every job is different and has its own specs.”
The author is Associate Editor of Lawn & Landscape magazine.
Explore the June 1997 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Lawn & Landscape
- Hilltip adds extended auger models
- What 1,000 techs taught us
- Giving Tuesday: Project EverGreen extends Bourbon Raffle deadline
- Atlantic-Oase names Ward as CEO of Oase North America
- JohnDow Industries promotes Tim Beltitus to new role
- WAC Landscape Lighting hosts webinar on fixture adjustability
- Unity Partners forms platform under Yardmaster brand
- Fort Lauderdale landscaper hospitalized after electrocution