There’s more to buying a car than just heading to a dealership and handing over a down payment.
Smart car shoppers first identify what they want their new vehicles to do for them and then cruise down the highway on test drives. Ultimately, someone who thought they wanted to take a sporty convertible with bucket seats to the beach every weekend may realize that their ideal auto is actually a trendy SUV with room for their beach chairs and a hitch for their jet skis.
Though it may not seem like cars built for asphalt have much in common with seeds tailored for turf, contractors need to approach turf seed selection similarly to the way they would buy a new car. Not only will research help narrow down their ideal turf seed selections, but contractors will find that identifying the right blend for jobs like overseeding will keep turf from looking like a mismatched paint job.
The following tips from seed producers can help contractors drive away with the best possible blends.
LICENSE TO DRIVE. Most turf seed producers agree that the first step for contractors to find the right turf seed is knowing what they want the turf to do – or not do, as the case may be.
“Contractors need to be sure of what they’re looking for and what goals they’re trying to accomplish,” says John Walters, vice president of turf products, Barenbrug USA, Tangent, Ore. “If they don’t tell their supplier that the place they’re going to put the seed has a limited water supply or receives some extreme amount of wear, then they could easily choose the wrong blend or mixture.” In these cases, Walters explains that identifying the need for drought- or wear-tolerant seed helps contractors narrow down their seed options significantly.
Steve Tubbs agrees, adding that even within a relatively localized area, appropriate turf seed selections can vary greatly. “Every turfgrass user needs to consider the environment for the area of use,” he says. “Water, elevation, maintenance and soil type are all major considerations that make it difficult to prescribe one species for any given area.”
Southern California is a good example of a region where environmental differences impact turf seed choice. “You would think that Los Angeles would only use one type of grass,” Tubbs comments. “However, if you’re coastal you would probably use turf-type tall fescue, which has the appearance of bluegrass but the heat and drought tolerance of tall fescue. But if you’re in an inland desert, you would probably grow Bermudagrass and overseed with ryegrass when it goes dormant for a green winter lawn.”
Moreover, Tubbs adds that areas at higher elevations within that region may even be able to sustain a bluegrass lawn because of the colder winters. Knowing this reinforces the need to detail an area’s environmental factors before diving into a seed purchase.
ROAD TEST. In addition to environmental research before purchasing seed, contractors must also do some field testing – literally. Both new and old turfgrass varieties are field tested by organizations like the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP), as well was universities and extension services. These trials help determine seed quality and performance and can help determine if a cultivar is well adapted to a local area or level of turf maintenance.
“It’s best to look at data from close to where you are or from your region,” explains Leah Brilman, director of research, Seed Research of Oregon, Corvallis, Ore. “Also, some of that data is subdivided into the level of management, so if the contractor is looking for seed for a home lawn situation, they’re going to want to look at the data for something that’s managed more like a home lawn.” Likewise, Brilman notes that if the seed will be planted in an area where the turf will not be irrigated, areas in the trial data will describe how the turf was managed so contractors can specify varieties that performed well in non-irrigated situations.
But in the same way that crash tests don’t tell everything about a car, contractors shouldn’t depend on NTEP data alone when choosing turf seed. Field days on testing sites are good opportunities for test driving turf. “Contractors should use field days as opportunities to walk over the plots themselves because what they think is important for an application may be different from what the person who’s rating the trial thinks is important.”
For instance, Brilman explains that good color is often a key characteristic that evaluators look for during turfgrass trials, and certain varieties may get extra points and, thus, higher ratings, if they have particularly good color. However, a contractor’s main concern may be density or disease resistance with color as a secondary point. In these situations, even if the contractor chooses a variety that’s a shade lighter in color, the disease resistance is what will limit customer callbacks.
SHOP AROUND. Seed producers also recommend that contractors get second opinions from sources beyond research trials. For instance, seed distributors are good sources of information and can put contractors in touch with other people who have used certain turf seed varieties. “A distributor might be likely to say that his or her turfgrass species is the best, but they can also provide information on end-users who have already used certain products.” Brilman says. “The contractor can find out who else in the area is using this variety or blend and can actually go look at it and get a feel for how it will function over a large area.”
Tubbs agrees. “Contractors have many informational sources other than just NTEP,” he says. “One of the best sources is his or her local sod grower. Turfgrass Producers International has members in every major market and these professionals depend on growing the right sod for the right area.”
SWITCHING GEARS. After learning about the different varieties suitable to their clients’ lawns, contractors should identify their top 10 to 20 cultivars and prepare to be flexible among those choices.
“If the contractor selects 10 varieties that they like, they may find that they’re owned by eight different companies,” Brilman explains. “Some of those companies may sell to each other to create blends and some won’t. So unless the contractor is willing to blend the seeds himself, he may have to go with a selection a little farther down on his list.”
Moreover, having multiple options from which to choose can help increase a blend’s overall strength. “If someone’s looking for bluegrass, they may come up with their list by choosing the five top-performing varieties from the trial,” Brilman says. “But those top five may be almost the same genetically and you don’t want a blend of things that are that similar. Without some genetic variability, they’ll have the same strengths, but they’ll also have the same weaknesses.”
BUYER BEWARE. For many homeowners, keeping up with the Joneses is a matter of having the best stuff on the street – and that includes both cars and lawns. If Mr. Smith buys a vehicle that makes his or her neighbors point and stare – and not in the good way – he’s likely to hide the car in the garage with a bruised ego or head back to the dealership for a conversation with his salesperson.
But if the wrong type of turf seed is chosen, not only will Mr. Smith have nowhere to conceal his gossip-inducing lawn, but his lawn care contractor will bear the brunt of his irritation. “If you choose the wrong variety, it may die, it may get disease and you may have to spend more money on herbicides, fungicides and watering,” Brilman says. “All turf varieties will require different levels of maintenance depending on the environment they’re planted in. In the cases where environmental stresses are very high, it increases your overall costs.”
By using producers’ advice, contractors will have better experiences in turf seed showrooms and can avoid unnecessary client callbacks . It’s all green lights from there.
| NTEP In Depth |
Through annual trials of hundreds of turf varieties, the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program provides ratings for turf seed based on varieties’ performances under certain conditions. But what, exactly, are researchers looking for in those trials, and how do they know when they find it? As the “Guide to NTEP Turfgrass Ratings” explains, turfgrass evaluators are trained to notice visual differences in all areas of turfgrass quality and use a scale of 1 to 9 to rate each variety in several categories, doing their best to eliminate the subjectivity that can creep into the evaluations. To do this, evaluators are asked to conduct visual evaluations on cloud-covered days when shadows and reflections are minimal. Here is some background on the specific characteristics evaluators look at and how those characteristics are rated. 1. Quality. Turfgrass quality is based on a 1 to 9 rating scale with 9 being ideal turf and 1 being poor or dead. A rating of 6 or above is generally considered acceptable. Within a species, quality ratings are relative; among species, they are not. For example, an acceptable rating of 6 or above within tall fescue cultivars is not relative to the same value among Kentucky bluegrasses. Quality ratings are based on measures of color, density, uniformity, texture and disease or environmental stress. 2. Color. Genetic Color. Genetic color reflects the inherent color of the genotype and is based on a visual rating scale with 1 being light green and 9 being dark green. Genetic color ratings are collected while the turf is actively growing and not under stress. Winter Color. Winter color assesses overall plot color retention during the winter months. A rating of 1 equals straw brown or no color retention, while a rating of 9 equals dark green. Seasonal Color/Color Retention. Seasonal color can be used to differentiate color based on damage caused by pests, nutrient deficiency or environmental stress. Also, color retention reflects the turf’s ability to hold its color as seasons change. This is especially useful in quantifying the response of warm-season grasses to temperature changes or frost occurring in fall. This cateogry also rates overall plot color as 1 being straw brown and 9 being dark green. 3. Spring Green-up. Spring green-up measures the transition from winter dormancy to active spring growth and is based on plot color rather than genetic color. The visual rating of spring greenup is based on a 1-to-9 rating scale with 1 being straw brown and 9 being completely green. 4. Leaf Texture. Turfgrass texture is a measure of leaf width. The 1-to-9 texture rating scale holds 1 as coarse and 9 as fine. Visual assessment of texture is difficult imprecise; however, physical measurement is time consuming and labor intensive. Evaluators take care to measure leaves of similar age and stage of development while the turfgrass is actively growing and not under stress. 5. Density. Turfgrass density is a visual estimate of living plants per unit area, excluding dead patches. On the rating scale, 9 signifies maximum density, which can be determined by counting shoots in a specified area. This is time consuming and labor intensive, so visual turfgrass density ratings are highly correlated to counts and require much less time and labor input. Density ratings are collected in spring, summer and fall to account for seasonal variation, particularly with cool-season turfgrasses. 6. Living Ground Cover. Living ground cover expresses the amount of damage caused by disease, insects, weeds or environmental stress by identifying the percentage of surface area covered by the originally planted species. This is often measured in the spring, summer and fall, which allows evaluators to track the turfgrass response to various stresses during the growing season. 7. Seedling Vigor/Establishment. Seedling vigor or establishment is a visual estimate of the percent ground cover, plant height, etc., that reflects the relative speed at which a variety develops into mature sod. Seedling vigor is rated on a 1-to-9 scale with 9 being maximum vigor. Establishment is rated by the percent of coverage. 8. Disease or Insect Damage. Using the 1-to-9 rating scale, 1 equals no resistance to disease and insects or 100-percent injury and 9 equals complete resistance or no injury. Evaluators usually identify disease and insect genus and species in their reports. 9. Drought Tolerance. Drought tolerance is assessed as wilting, leaf firing, dormancy or recovery. A 1-to-9 visual rating scale is used with 1 being complete wilting, 100 percent leaf firing, complete dormancy or no plant recovery and 9 being no wilting, no leaf firing, 100-percent green (no dormancy) or 100 percent recovery. 10. Frost Tolerance/Winter Kill. Direct low temperature (winter kill) and desiccation injury are generally expressed as a visual estimate of the percent damaged ground cover. Frost injury is expressed on a 1 to 9 rating scale with 1 equaling 100 percent leaf injury and 9 equaling no injury. 11. Traffic Tolerance. Traffic tolerance is a combination of wear and compaction stress that occur whenever turf is exposed to foot or vehicle traffic. NTEP reports traffic tolerance as a visual estimate of turfgrass tolerance using a 1-to-9 rating scale with 1 being no tolerance or 100 percent injury and 9 being complete tolerance or no injury. 12. Thatch Accumulation. Thatch depth is measured by collecting four 5-centimeter plugs of turf, removing the verdure and placing a 1-kilogram (2.2 pound) weight on the surface of the thatch. The compressed thatch is then measured in millimeters. 13. Seedheads. Certain turfgrass species can produce significant numbers of seedheads in turf. These are generally considered unsightly and reduce the quality of the turf stand. Seedheads are rated from 1 to 9 with 9 equaling no seedheads. 14. Poa annua Invasion. Poa annua can either be rated as a percentage of the total coverage of each plot or on a scale of 1 to 9 with 9 equaling no Poa annua. 15. Mowing Quality/Steminess. This rating reflects the uniformity and cleanness of cut exhibited by some grasses. On the rating scale, 1 equals poorest mowing quality/most steminess and 9 equals cleanest cut/no steminess. – Lauren Spiers Source: www.ntep.org
|
The author is associate editor of Lawn & Landscape magazine and can be reached at lspiers@gie.net.
Explore the June 2004 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Lawn & Landscape
- Hilltip adds extended auger models
- What 1,000 techs taught us
- Giving Tuesday: Project EverGreen extends Bourbon Raffle deadline
- Atlantic-Oase names Ward as CEO of Oase North America
- JohnDow Industries promotes Tim Beltitus to new role
- WAC Landscape Lighting hosts webinar on fixture adjustability
- Unity Partners forms platform under Yardmaster brand
- Fort Lauderdale landscaper hospitalized after electrocution