GreenSearch People: Making Your “Team” Work For You

Why don’t teams “work” all the time? Generally, there are five barriers that prevent effective teamwork.

It is amazing over the years how business terms and their corresponding buzzwords seem to catch on and become fashionable almost overnight. Almost everything anyone reads contains the latest one, and people can’t seem to get through a sentence without using one or two of them. Yet the words’ very popularity turns it into an instant cliché whose original meaning becomes obscured. Exterior and interior landscape companies have their own fair share of words and terms, one being “teamwork.”

The implication is that if business owners and managers can promote teamwork within their organizations, positive results are sure to follow. Their employees will obviously achieve greater productivity by collaborating than by working independently. This kind of group interaction will provide something extra, i.e. unique insights, ideas, solutions and direction that can only come a “team.” It is a sound concept and certainly one that should work, but unfortunately it often fails to materialize. If teamwork is to be more than just a popular buzzword, it is necessary to examine why it doesn’t always work.

Why don’t teams “work” all the time? Our experience has demonstrated that generally there are five barriers that have prevented or forestalled effective teamwork from happening in companies. The following will identify those barriers to teamwork and corresponding remedies in no particular order of importance or sequence.

Failure to elicit complete and accurate information. If there is one thing everyone on a team should know, it’s how to probe, how to elicit information from each other. Yet remarkably few people do know, probably because listening skills is very rarely taught in schools or colleges. Business owners and their managers should try several approaches which include open-end (“Tell me how . . .”), pauses (Just listen and let ‘em talk!), summaries (“OK, let me see if I understand . . .”) and reflective statements (“Remember when we . . .”) which do produce sizable amounts of information. No team is likely to blend together if it doesn’t get to the heart of the issue. Just keep in mind that complete and accurate information is rarely presented spontaneously, it has to be uncovered.

Promotional leadership. A promotional leader leaks his or her own ideas to subordinates before they have had a chance to state theirs (“I think we ought to change that completely, but right now what do you think?”). Nothing will do more to stifle discussion and squelch openness. Although not deliberate, many team leaders simply blurt out their views without considering the consequences. Do not use this technique to simultaneously show a level of subtle support while making sure no real discussion takes place.

Intra-team conflict. Most cohesive teams don’t sit around and make “warm and fuzzy, “ non-confrontational conversation. They argue, they debate, they say things openly and honestly; they tell it like it is. However, once team members start pushing for their own separate goals and agendas, candor will disappear, questioning will place others on the defensive, debate becomes dissension, teamwork disappears and is replaced by one-upmanship. As a team leader, make sure you do not allow private agendas to corrupt otherwise good team intentions.

Insufficient alternatives. A team that wants to make decisions with “something extra” in them should consider all the options before deciding on one. That seldom happens. Many teams feel uncomfortable brainstorming, although it’s essential to generating options. Generally teams object on the grounds that brainstorming produces too many crazy ideas, too much talk and too much wasted time. Make sure your team understands that exploring alternatives is not just talking, but a vehicle to allow the group to arrive at the best idea instead of merely a good idea.

Failure to cycle ideas downward. This is crucial. Many a good decision has died because the team failed to cycle it downward - explain it to all the people whose collaboration will be needed to make it succeed. A decision made at one level thus may never filter down to lower levels, even though those levels are indispensable to the decision’s implementation and success. This is why many a manager has scratched their head in anguish, wondering what went wrong!

There you have it . . . when it comes to teamwork, there is no known limit to what people can achieve. When things are really clicking and collaboration is at its best, the word “teamwork” has real meaning.

No more results found.
No more results found.